Related topics

Vista performance copying files to a Windows 2000 server
Rob R...@discussions.microsoft.com microsoft public windows vista general http://forums.guru3d.com/showthread.php?t=233070 V64 and riva tuner , have a look at these websites. "gizbug" wrote: There is a 64bit and 32bit version. Google "Vista Performance and Reliability Pack" and you will get many hits. -- gizbug.

Vista performance. Wie?
If that is the case, then I think the problem lies in with your video. With PCIE it perform a lot better than with AGP. If I had $300 to spare, I would solve my slower Vista performance problem. I had bought a $75 nVidia 7300 back in March, but it only increased te Index Peformance by .7 That sucks.

You might not want to move off XP
SpammersDie x...@xx.xx comp sys ibm pc games action "John" <j.mot...@comcast.net> wrote in message news:-aWdnQgmsNCKqKTbnZ2dnUVZ_u-unZ2d@comcast.com... Mine are: Processor: 5.9 (Intel Q6800) Memory: 5.9 (3GB DDR2 1066MHz) Graphics: 5.9 (8800GTX) Gaming Graphics: 5.9 Primary Hard Disk: 5.7 (Western Digital 320GB) Does

Vista Performance
I've enabled vfs objects = readahead to get better performance in vista. The biggest difference I notice between vista and other clients is that the %iowait is MUCH higher than with the other clients. Logs show the readahead module being loaded but I have no idea if it is actually doing anything.

Problema al evaluar el equipo
Vern Linard VernLin...@aol.ca microsoft public windows vista general Vista has the most unfriendly GUI since windows 3.1.

Microsoft commissioned reports on Windows Vista SP1 performance
Charax ch...@NOSPAMparthia.com microsoft public access There is a new twist to my problems with Access performance on Vista, and perhaps someone can direct me toward a solution based on these new clues. I'm on a long trip with my laptop and intermittently connect to the Internet by dial-up.

Vista performance
PMorgan pmorgan.nos...@nc.rr.com microsoft public windows vista general I have to purchase a new desktop and Dell will only honor their sale prices if Vista is installed (in other words, they'll give me XP, but they'll charge me more). I need to know if Vista is a stable OS -- or if it would be worth it to pay more

Vista slower than XP
James Matthews jamesmat...@gmail.com microsoft public windows vista performance_maintenance try to uninstall everything and then see how performance is affected! It could be your AV! Those AV products don't work well with the 64 bit chips! -- http://search.goldwatches.com/?Search=Movado+Watches

Microsoft commissioned reports on Windows Vista SP1 performance
(david) Charax wrote: There is a new twist to my problems with Access performance on Vista, and perhaps someone can direct me toward a solution based on these new clues. I'm on a long trip with my laptop and intermittently connect to the Internet by dial-up. I've discovered by chance that: (1) if I restart Vista

Good site;Top 10 Windows Vista Performance Tweaks
Mike Hall - MVP mikeh...@mvps.com microsoft public windows vista general "R. McCarty" <PcEngWork-NoSp...@mindspring.com> wrote in message And the truth is that XP is 30-40% faster than Vista RTM and 30-20% faster than SP1 Vista SP1 is faster than RTM... but XP leaves vista behind in the DUST.

Vista performance copying files to a Windows 2000 server
I suppose I could also use that approach to enable them on my local machine, if ever necesary. IIRC there is a performance hit that comes with using .htaccess (since each subdirectory must then be searched for the existence of any overriding .htaccess). But in my case, with low traffic, that shouldn't matter much

What happened with the two "Vista Performance Patches ...
Ron S newredw...@gmx.invalid free uk btinternet chatter refugees Phil blurted on Sat, 18 Aug 2007 11:53:15 +0100: It wasn't the Microsoft Vista "performance update" that made the system slow to a crawl. It was nVidia Mediashield. Humbug. I blame Phil :-) -- It is my belief, Watson, founded upon my experience,

Vista performance copying files to a Windows 2000 server
Installed new 4GB DDR SDRAM DIMM (Corsair XMS Twin2048-3200c2) on MSI 865PE/GNeo2 Motherboard with a Pentium 4 3.0GHz CPU. Checked all installation issues and recommemded Bios setting. Vista performance and app responses are slower than before the upgrade and unstisfactory. Must I do reinstall Vista and if so can I

Microsoft commissioned reports on Windows Vista SP1 performance
Here are the links for the non-security related updates: An update is available that improves the compatibility and reliability of Windows Vista: http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=938194 An update is available that improves the performance and reliability of Windows Vista: http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=938979

Very Poor performance
Dear friends: What happened with the two "Vista Performance Patches" (or similar) expected for yesterday? I read somewhere in this group that two patches related to performance and bugs were scheduled for release in August's Patch Tuesday, but I didn't detected them when I downloaded the security patches yesterday.

Vista performance
Craig Anderson CraigAnder...@discussions.microsoft.com microsoft public windows vista networking_sharing I have found a repeatable problem involving extremely poor performance copying files from my Vista (Ultimate x86) PC to any of our Windows 2000 servers. the probelm is evident whether using the Explorer to

Warcraft and Vista
"Bob J" wrote: Check out link below, advice on setting up PC to run better http://www.vistax64.com/tutorials/81176-speed-up-performance-vista.html -- Regards Bob J If advise given from anyone, solves problem or not, or if solved from another source,post back & let us know. Then we all benefit. "

dobbio vista
Vista performance and app responses are slower than before the upgrade and unsatisfactory. Nowhere near satisfactory or normally expected performance even for the simplest operational task. As well, extremely long boot and shut down time. Prior to the new 4GB DDR SDRAM DIMM (Corsair XMS Twin2048-3200c2) I was

Changing the microprocessor
(Intel P4 2,8GHz HT, 1GB ram duacl channel, 80GB HDD, GeForce4 mx 440 64MB) Hubert -------------------------- hub...@zilina.sk http://hubert.qsh.sk try news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windows.vista.general -- Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM "Anyone who prefers security over freedom deserves neither."

What happened with the two "Vista Performance Patches ...
If I run SQL 2005 under a Virtual machine running xp, the app runs fine but if I run the application with SQL 2005 under vista performance is slow. Configuration: Vista all patches according to Windows Update SQL 2005 - SP2 Doesnt work Vista - running SQL 2005 in a VM under XP Works Can someone point me in the