Related topics

Vista Performance and Reliability Pack
gizbug gizbug.2uj...@no-mx.forums.net microsoft public windows vista general There is a 64bit and 32bit version. Google "Vista Performance and Reliability Pack" and you will get many hits. -- gizbug.

Frankly, Win95 performed better
Starbuck Starb...@discussions.microsoft.com microsoft public windows vista performance_maintenance I am running a SLI 8800 GTX video card and I have received gig of corsai extreme 5400 ddr ATI 1950 graphics card with 512 mb vista ultimate performance rating 5.8 It really makes me wonder how this rating came about.

Vista Performance
I was wondering if someone with a more powerful machine (like DDR2 memory) could post their Vista performance information, assuming I am not the only person using it, so I can see if my machine is working about right. My scores: Overall: 4.1 Processor: 4.9 Memory: 4.1 Graphics: 5.9 Gaming graphics: 4.7 Primary hard

Media Player 11, Vista Performance Issues
Waldy wa...@notmail.com microsoft public windowsxp general "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE" <franksaund...@mvps.org> wrote in message news:uSUJwJgjGHA.1324@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... "Anyone who prefers security over freedom deserves neither." Can you pass that on to the people who designed SP2!

Microsoft commissioned reports on Windows Vista SP1 performance
I've noticed when running vista's performance monitor on clusterA, monitoring % Disk Time, that when I write something to the main drive that not only the does that drive's % Disk Time go up but so does the shadow drive. We have shadow copies set to go off at 7am every morning. Why is it that when I copy a large

Windows Vista Performance Codes in Event Viewer for one
John Inzer oo...@doobie.xyz microsoft public windows vista general Juan I. Cahis wrote: Dear friends: What happened with the two "Vista Performance Patches" (or similar) expected for yesterday? I read somewhere in this group that two patches related to performance and bugs were scheduled for release in August's

Vista Performance
dmex dmex.2r0...@no-mx.forums.net microsoft public windows vista performance_maintenance Vista does performance checks, DRM checks and file management optimizations nearly every hour. for your system these checks might be quite intense when they run but over time they get less and less and vista will preform better

Vista performance help required
If the price change is more than you would have to pay for XP, you might be better off letting them put Vista on it, then replace it with a self-purchased copy of XP after you receive the machine. I've just been reading the postings about Explorer and at this point, I don't think I care what the price difference is

Vista Performance
Charax ch...@NOSPAMparthia.com microsoft public access George, your experience mirrors mine with slow ODBC performance under Vista. There is something wrong (or not intuitively fixable) in Vista with ODBC. I've been chasing this in several threads, most recently with Rick Byham in a thread titled "Vista,

Performance measurments?
Joe J...@discussions.microsoft.com microsoft public windows vista performance_maintenance i have a similar system (Athlon X2 overclocked to 2.42 ghz, 1 gig of pc 3200 ram & an nvidia 7900) and have performance problems too. I think alot of it comes from the fact that vista is much more ram intensive than xp is.

php.ini not being read in vista
PeterNL my...@yours.com nl comp os ms-windows Ben inmiddels weer terug bij XP, maar ik ben eigenlijk nog wel benieuwt naar enkele performance indexen van Vista machines. Mijn index was: Processor 4,3 Memory 4,8 Graphics (Aero) 4,6 Gaming graphics 4,0 Prim. harddisk 5,4 Overall dus een 4,0 Peter.

Downloaded add-ons and Vista performance.
Vern Linard VernLin...@aol.ca microsoft public windows vista general Dell is total crap if they are saying that XP and Vista preinstalled cost about the same.. Now listen... beat the system and buy Vista ultimate, and then normaly you are entitled to a free copy of XP PRO as DOWNGRADE RIGHTS, ask and insist DELL to

What happened with the two "Vista Performance Patches ...
On booting up the first time the processor was only running at 2GHz, (should have been 3GHz), and Windows Vista's performance indicator actually fell below the old processor. Then I noticed the processor temperature was up at 70 deg! Then the computer switched off. Guess what. The processor heat-sink was hanging on

Help is on the way Vista Performance and Reliability Pack
gizbug gizbug.2uj...@no-mx.forums.net microsoft public windows vista general 938979 VISTA PERFORMANCE AND RELIABILITY PACK[/B] THIS UPDATE RESOLVES A NUMBER OF INDIVIDUAL ISSUES WHICH MAY BE AFFECTING SOME COMPUTERS RUNNING WINDOWS VISTA. THESE ISSUES HAVE BEEN REPORTED BY CUSTOMERS USING THE ERROR REPORTING

Microsoft commissioned reports on Windows Vista SP1 performance
Brink Brink.35k...@no-mx.forums.net microsoft public windows vista general Heath;629936 Wrote: I have used the upgrade kit for vista home premium. I am wondering if I should do a clean install of vista (wipe drive clean) cause i did not know it would leave the old OS on the drive. And will the performance increase

Vista Performance
Swingman k...@nospam.com microsoft public windows vista general "Michael Yardley" wrote in message Perhaps ... but what the site arguably does well is tout software. :) Trying those tweaks initially upon my first exposure to Vista made little, if any, difference in its performance ... resulting in undoing most of

Access 2007 with Vista performance slow
Julian Julianlz...@gmail.com microsoft public windows vista general "gizbug" <gizbug.2uj...@no-mx.forums.net> wrote in message news:gizbug.2ujcjp@no-mx.forums.net... Caps lock off please. Early reports indicate that the problems experiences when copying very large files have been fixed.. 938979 VISTA PERFORMANCE

Access 2007 or 2003 with Vista performance slow
DanS thisnthat@adelphianet microsoft public windows vista general "Gary Mount" <gary_mo...@telus.net> wrote in news:eyK#eZjeIHA.3368@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl: And the truth is that XP is 30-40% faster than Vista RTM and 30-20% faster than SP1 Vista SP1 is faster than RTM... but XP leaves vista behind in the DUST.

Vista performance issue
Mike Hall - MVP mikeh...@mvps.com microsoft public windows vista general "On the Bridge!" <On@the,Bridge> wrote in message And the truth is that XP is 30-40% faster than Vista RTM and 30-20% faster than SP1 Vista SP1 is faster than RTM... but XP leaves vista behind in the DUST. -- What people are REALLY saying

Vista performance (uggh)
Myweb mei...@gmx.de microsoft public windows vista general Hello gizbug, Where are the links to MS download sites? Nothing to find on MS website. Seems to be SPAM Best regards Myweb Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. 938979 VISTA PERFORMANCE AND RELIABILITY